The Statewide Landcover and Trees Study (SLATS) monitors woody vegetation extent, and changes to that extent due to clearing and regrowth using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery as its primary monitoring tool.
The 2020–21 SLATS reporting period is nominally from August 2020 to August 2021. Regional summary data for bioregions are also included in the report. The 2020–21 report and data are directly comparable with the 2018–19 report and 2019–20 report. However they are not comparable with SLATS reports up to and including 2017–18 due to a change in methodology.
With an area of approximately 173 million hectares, Queensland is the second largest state in Australia. It is nearly five times the size of Japan and seven times the size of Great Britain. It is home to diverse flora and fauna due to its unique habitats which include extensive arid and semi-arid rangelands, and temperate, sub-tropical and tropical environments.
Queensland has more than 1,400 regional ecosystems with the majority of these described as woody regional ecosystems. These woody regional ecosystems include the sparse and very sparse shrublands and woodlands of the extensive arid and semi-arid rangelands, and the sparse woodlands and mid-dense and dense forests and rainforests along the Great Dividing Range, coastal plains, and in the Cape York Peninsula and Wet Tropics bioregions. These ecosystems play a critical role in supporting biodiversity, maintaining landscape function and water quality, supporting agricultural production, sequestering and storing atmospheric carbon dioxide, and providing recreation and natural amenity. To conserve, protect, and sustainably use these ecosystems in a changing climate, it is essential to have spatial and temporal data and information to characterise their composition and structure and to monitor their dynamics.
In Queensland, the regional ecosystems framework provides the basis for describing the vegetation types and their remnant status. The Statewide Landcover and Trees Study (SLATS) monitors woody vegetation extent, and changes to that extent due to clearing and regrowth, using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery as its primary monitoring tool. A Spatial BioCondition framework has also been developed to characterise and map the condition of the state’s regional ecosystems. Combined, these initiatives provide a spatially and temporally comprehensive account of Queensland’s ecosystems based on peer-reviewed science.
The current series of SLATS reporting monitors and reports change in woody vegetation extent against a woody extent baseline, first introduced in 2018 and updated annually based on mapping of woody vegetation clearing and regrowth. Additional scientific approaches have also been developed to attribute the degree of modification associated with the clearing activity and to provide estimates of woody vegetation density and age since disturbance, that is, when the vegetation was last disturbed or began to regrow following a disturbance event. These approaches aim to better describe the woody vegetation that currently exists, and where and how its extent is changing.
The 2020–21 SLATS report is nominally for the period August 2020 to August 2021. Regional summary data for bioregions are also included. The 2020–21 report and data are directly comparable with the 2018–19 report and 2019–20 report. However, they are not comparable with previous SLATS reports up to and including 2017–18 due to a change in methodology.
It is important to note that clearing activity mapped by SLATS in remnant and high-value regrowth areas does not always result in a conversion to non-remnant. The Queensland Herbarium uses SLATS data to inform remnant and high-value regrowth updates as part of regular regional ecosystem updates. These updates consider the clearing activity as well as a range of other criteria associated with the regional ecosystem mapping methodology, including the remnant and high-value regrowth definitions. For data and information on change in remnant vegetation, visit Remnant regional ecosystem vegetation in Queensland.
Note: There may be slight differences in the reported area figures compared with areas derived from the published SLATS spatial data. This is due to differences in the way the areas are represented in published SLATS vector data sets (i.e. data is represented in a polygon format) compared with raster data sets (i.e. data represented in a grid format) which are used for reporting. For the same reason, there may also be slight differences between figures stated in the SLATS 2020–21 report and the figures provided in the SLATS vegetation management analysis. Also, due to re-processing and some rounding, previously reported figures may differ slightly to figures and data files provided with the 2020–21 report.
Note: Since the release of 2018–19 SLATS report, the methods for estimating the age since disturbance of woody vegetation have been refined and data updated. The estimates are based on time-since-cleared data derived from SLATS clearing histories, and time-series analysis of more than 30 years of Landsat satellite imagery aimed at detecting woody vegetation disturbance and regrowth. The age since disturbance estimates use the time-series information where sufficient evidence is available to assign a valid estimate of how long the woody vegetation has been regrowing following a disturbance event. These updates have resulted in the following for SLATS reporting and published data:
For more information on how the age since disturbance estimates are derived, refer to the SLATS methodology. It is important to note that woody vegetation that is greater than 15 years is not always considered to be remnant or high-value regrowth, as additional criteria such as species composition and vegetation height are used to determine remnant or high-value regrowth status. This is determined by the Queensland Herbarium as part of the regional ecosystem mapping framework.
In 2020–21, a total of 349,399ha of woody vegetation was affected by clearing activity in Queensland—this includes full and partial clearing. This is a 17% decrease in clearing activity from 2019–20 (418,656ha) and a 49% decrease from 2018–19 (680,688ha). Of the total clearing activity undertaken in 2020–21, 322,515ha (92% of all clearing activity) resulted in full removal of the woody vegetation (i.e. full clearing). The remaining 26,884ha of clearing activity was partial clearing.
At the start of the 2020–21 monitoring period, approximately 7.6 million ha of the state’s woody vegetation was not mapped as remnant or high-value regrowth vegetation and is therefore assumed to be existing regrowth woody vegetation.
In the 2020–21 monitoring period, 59,654ha of new regrowth was mapped. These are areas that were not previously mapped in the 2018 woody vegetation extent baseline or in the 2019–20 monitoring period and are only now considered to have sufficient woody vegetation cover to be added to the woody extent. Given most of the existing regrowth was captured in the 2018 baseline, high levels of new regrowth would not be expected in the first few years to follow. This is due to the generally longer timeframes it takes for new regrowth to become sufficiently woody to enable reliable identification and mapping.
At the end of the 2020–21 SLATS monitoring period, Queensland had 95,414,287ha of woody vegetation. From a starting balance of 95,677,148ha, 322,515ha was subtracted for full clearing and 59,654ha was added for new regrowth. This represents a net reduction of 262,861ha in the extent of the state’s woody vegetation from 2019–20.
Category | Gain (ha) | Loss (ha) | Balance (ha) |
---|---|---|---|
Opening balance August 2020 | - | - | 95,679,990 |
Adjustment | 10,245 | -13,088 | 95,677,148 |
Crop | 4,041 | -5,156 | 95,676,033 |
Forestry | 14,531 | -11,312 | 95,679,252 |
Infrastructure | 86 | -2,243 | 95,677,095 |
Mine | 1,117 | -4,736 | 95,673,476 |
Pasture | 39,837 | -297,881 | 95,415,432 |
Settlement | 42 | -1,187 | 95,414,284 |
Closing balance August 2021 | - | - | 95,414,287 |
This transaction summary shows the opening balance of woody vegetation at the start of the 2020–21 monitoring period, the losses due to clearing activity that resulted in the full removal of the woody vegetation, and the gains due to new regrowth, for each landcover replacement class. Loss and gain adjustments were made to correct for areas in the woody extent that were identified as previous errors during the SLATS mapping processes. A closing balance at the end of the 2020–21 monitoring period is provided.
While these figures represent a net reduction in woody vegetation extent, it is important to acknowledge that not all vegetation change is equal. For example, clearing in remnant areas cannot be directly compared with clearing in non-remnant areas in terms of the impacts on biodiversity, carbon or landscape function. Similarly, new regrowth does not offset remnant loss for the same reasons.
In 2020–21, about 15% (54,136ha) of the statewide clearing activity was in Category B (regulated remnant) areas. This represents a 39% decrease in clearing activity from 2019–20 (88,327ha). The Brigalow Belt (41% or 22,288ha), Mulga Lands (17% or 9,105ha) and Mitchell Grass Downs (15% or 7,901ha) bioregions had the highest areas of Category B clearing activity, similar to 2019–20. However, each of these bioregions also recorded significant decreases in Category B clearing activity (36%, 65% and 20%, respectively) from 2019–20.
Of the Category B clearing activity, 70% (37,888ha) resulted in full removal of the woody vegetation, with the remainder of the Category B clearing activity distributed between areas that were partially cleared with a major level of disturbance (11% or 6,207ha) or partially cleared with a minor level of disturbance (19% or 10,041ha). About 1% (4,701ha) of the statewide clearing activity was in Category C (high-value regrowth vegetation)—a 28% decrease from 2019–20 (6,512ha). Less than 1% (2,321ha) of the clearing activity was in areas that intersect with Category R (regrowth watercourse area)—a 5% decrease from 2019–20 (2,447ha).
Clearing activity in Category X areas accounted for 82% (288,165ha) of the total clearing activity—a 10% decrease from 2019–20 (320,952ha). Almost all this clearing activity (97% or 278,884ha) resulted in full removal of the woody vegetation. About half of the Category X clearing activity was in the Brigalow Belt bioregion (53% or 154,092ha) with a further 22% (62,861ha) occurring in the Mulga Lands bioregion. Category X areas are those that are not generally regulated by the Vegetation Management Act 1999, as identified in the Regulated vegetation management map.
In 2020–21, about 14% (49,850ha) of the clearing activity was in areas that contained least concern regional ecosystems—a decrease of 33% from 2019–20 (74,305ha). About 3% (10,546ha) of the clearing was in areas identified as having of concern regional ecosystems—a decrease of about 52% from 2019–20 (21,748ha). Less than 1% (2,714ha) of the clearing was in areas which have endangered regional ecosystems present—44% decrease from 2019-20 (4,866ha). About 70% (1,891ha) of the clearing in areas which have endangered regional ecosystems present was in the Brigalow Belt bioregion and three-quarters (1,427ha) of this was full clearing. The remaining 82% (286,288ha) was in areas with no vegetation management class.
SLATS reporting applies the precautionary principle, with the highest vegetation management class used, regardless of the proportion present in regional ecosystem mapping. For example, where a mapped regional ecosystem contains least concern regional ecosystems as the dominant ecosystems, and an endangered regional ecosystem as subdominant, this will be reported as clearing in areas containing endangered regional ecosystems.
Of the state’s 13 bioregions, the Brigalow Belt (52% or 180,283ha) and Mulga Lands (21% or 72,238ha) accounted for nearly three-quarters (72%) of the state’s woody vegetation clearing activity. Both bioregions recorded decreases in clearing activity (10% and 34%, respectively) from 2019–20. There has been a continued significant decline in clearing activity in the Mulga Lands between 2018–19 (284,648ha) and 2020–21.
In each of these bioregions, over 90% of the clearing activity was mapped as full clearing. Most of the clearing activity in these two bioregions was in Category X areas, accounting for 85% (154,092ha) of the clearing in the Brigalow Belt and 87% (62,861ha) in the Mulga Lands. The bioregions with the next highest levels of clearing activity were Mitchell Grass Downs (8% of statewide total or 26,671ha), Desert Uplands (8% or 26,353ha) and Southeast Queensland (7% or 24,720ha). These bioregions all recorded decreases in clearing activity (1%, 21% and 18%, respectively) from 2019–20.
The Brigalow Belt bioregion had the greatest area of new regrowth mapped, contributing 39% (23,454ha) to the state’s total of 59,564ha. The Southeast Queensland bioregion had the next greatest area of new regrowth mapped, contributing about 20% (12,229ha) to the state’s total.
For further detailed breakdowns for each of the bioregions see further breakdowns by bioregion.
Clearing activity in the Great Barrier Reef catchment areas accounted for 47% (164,766ha) of the state’s total clearing—a 10% decrease in clearing activity from 2019–20 (182,904ha). About 90% (148,507ha) of the clearing in reef catchments in 2020–21 resulted in the full removal of the woody vegetation.
In 2020–21, about 61% (36,432ha) of the new regrowth mapped in the state was in Great Barrier Reef catchments.
In 2020–21, 89% (310,339ha) of the clearing activity was attributed to the pasture landcover replacement class—a 13% decrease from 2019–20 (357,604ha). Of this, about 96% was full clearing. A further 4% (12,905ha) was attributed to forestry, with crop (5,156ha) and mine (4,736ha) each accounting for about 1% of the total clearing activity.
About 67% (39,837ha) of the new regrowth mapped was attributed to the pasture landcover class, and about 24% (14,531) was attributed to forestry. A further 7% (4,041ha) was mapped as crop, mainly due to new tree-crop orchards in parts of Southeast Queensland (Burnett-Mary) and Wet Tropics (around Atherton) bioregions. Due to the difficulty of differentiating between native and non-native woody vegetation using satellite imagery, non-native woody vegetation change is also included in SLATS. This may include exotic pine plantations, orchards or invasive exotic woody weeds.
In 2020–21, about 91% (317,866ha) of the total clearing activity occurred in sparse and very sparse woody vegetation (i.e. vegetation with less than 50% crown cover). This is reflective of a large proportion of the state’s clearing activity occurring in rangeland ecosystems including the Brigalow Belt, Mulga Lands, Desert Uplands and Mitchell Grass Downs bioregions, which are characterised by scattered trees and shrubs, open woodlands and shrublands. A further 9% (29,851ha) of the clearing activity occurred in mid-dense woody vegetation (i.e. 50–80% crown cover). Less than 1% of the total clearing occurred in dense woody vegetation (1,669ha).
Based on estimates of woody vegetation age since disturbance (refer to note), about 52% (182,913ha) of the total clearing activity in 2020–21 occurred in vegetation greater than 15 years old, and about 86% (157,676ha) of this occurred in sparse or very sparse woody vegetation.
About 36% (125,765ha) of the total clearing activity occurred in vegetation with an age since disturbance of less than 15 years, and most of this (96% or 121,267ha) occurred in sparse or very sparse woody vegetation. About 12% (40,721ha) of the clearing activity occurred in woody vegetation where a valid age since disturbance estimate could not be determined. Most of this clearing activity occurred in sparse or very sparse woody vegetation (96% or 38,923ha).
About 80% (47,933ha) of the regrowth mapped was categorised as sparse or very sparse woody vegetation. A further 20% (11,686ha) of the regrowth mapped was categorised as mid-dense woody vegetation and less than 1% (36ha) was in dense woody vegetation.
Of the 59,654ha of new regrowth mapped, 70% (41,484ha) was estimated to be less than 15 years old. A further 23% (13,651ha) of the new regrowth mapped was estimated to be greater than 15 years old, while the remaining 8% (4,520ha) was in areas where a valid ‘age since disturbance’ estimate could not be determined.
Most of the new regrowth (i.e. 90% or 12,318ha) is estimated to be greater than 15 years old was categorised as sparse or very sparse woody vegetation. These areas are likely to have been previously excluded from the 2018 woody extent baseline as they may not have been readily detectable in the satellite imagery used at the time and are now able to be reliably detected and mapped due to additional data in the time series or availability of other new imagery.
Note: Since the release of 2018–19 SLATS report, the methods for estimating the age since disturbance of woody vegetation have been refined and data updated. The estimates are based on time-since-cleared data derived from SLATS clearing histories, and time-series analysis of more than 30 years of Landsat satellite imagery aimed at detecting woody vegetation disturbance and regrowth. The age since disturbance estimates use the time-series information where sufficient evidence is available to assign a valid estimate of how long the woody vegetation has been regrowing following a disturbance event. These updates have resulted in the following for SLATS reporting and published data:
For more information on how the age since disturbance estimates are derived, refer to the SLATS methodology. It is important to note that woody vegetation that is greater than 15 years is not always considered to be remnant or high-value regrowth, as additional criteria such as species composition and vegetation height are used to determine remnant or high-value regrowth status. This is determined by the Queensland Herbarium as part of the regional ecosystem mapping framework.
Note: Since the release of 2018–19 SLATS report, the methods for estimating the age since disturbance of woody vegetation have been refined and data updated. The estimates are based on time-since-cleared data derived from SLATS clearing histories, and time-series analysis of more than 30 years of Landsat satellite imagery aimed at detecting woody vegetation disturbance and regrowth. The age since disturbance estimates use the time-series information where sufficient evidence is available to assign a valid estimate of how long the woody vegetation has been regrowing following a disturbance event. These updates have resulted in the following for SLATS reporting and published data:
For more information on how the age since disturbance estimates are derived, refer to the SLATS methodology. It is important to note that woody vegetation that is greater than 15 years is not always considered to be remnant or high-value regrowth, as additional criteria such as species composition and vegetation height are used to determine remnant or high-value regrowth status. This is determined by the Queensland Herbarium as part of the regional ecosystem mapping framework.
2020–21 SLATS Report, 17 Jul 2024, [https://oss-uat.clients.squiz.net/environment/land/management/mapping/statewide-monitoring/slats/slats-reports/2020-21-slats-report]
This document is uncontrolled when printed. Before using the information in this document you should verify the current content on https://oss-uat.clients.squiz.net/environment/land/management/mapping/statewide-monitoring/slats/slats-reports/2020-21-slats-report.